Welcome to Star Trek Simulation Forum

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Zephrah

Vulcan Logic

156 posts in this topic
Is it further to New York by bus?

The distence from anywhere to New york, would be the same by bus,or another method. The only difference is time. It may take you longer by one then by the other eventhough you are traveling the same distence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
#3

 

Question would be...hmm...been thinking about it and cant come up with an answer...whats the solution? Anything I come up with needs 2 questions. Since you have only 1 question with 2 possible outcomes, and 3 possible answers, I dont see that the problem is answerable.

Question: I am thinking of an integer 1-3 is your number higher then mine?

 

Thus if I say yes you can assume that my number is 3 if I say no my number is 1 and if I say maby the number would most likely be 2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You're in a boat on a lake.  If you throw your anchor out of the boat into the lake, does the level of the lake rise, fall, or stay the same?

Oh boy! We gave this one on a problem set to my physics class...

 

Floating things displace their weight in water. Nonfloating things displace their volume in water. The density of water, rho_w, is ~1g/cc. The density of the anchor, rho_a, (for example, iron ~ 5g/cc) must be greater than that of water, otherwise it wouldn't function as an anchor.

 

On the boat, the anchor is floating, so the total volume of water displaced by the anchor is V_w = rho_a*V/rho_w. But, in the water, it displaces its own volume V. We'll assume (as is usually the case), that the boat's average density does not change by losing its anchor (its volume doesn't change - the anchor was *in* the boat beforehand, right?). Since less water is displaced with the anchor in the water, the water level actually *falls*. :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Question: I am thinking of an integer 1-3 is your number higher then mine?

 

Thus if I say yes you can assume that my number is 3 if I say no my number is 1 and if I say maby the number would most likely be 2.

I assume that in order for this question to make sense, we both have to think of an integer at the same time. In that case, let's say we both think of "3." You saying "yes" may tell me what number you thought of, but, it is a false statement. 3 is not greater than 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the water level for the lake will stay the same

because the wiehg tof the anchor was already in ur boat and there fore you will not be adding any more volume to the water

 

I dont think thats correct...the weight of the anchor was distributed across the size of the boat, so its displacing less water than it would if it were to be in the water directly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When it rains do sheep shrink?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The distence from anywhere to New york, would be the same by bus,or another method. The only difference is time. It may take you longer by one then by the other eventhough you are traveling the same distence.

It was a joke. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When it rains do sheep shrink?

Not if you dry them on the clothsline.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The distence from anywhere to New york, would be the same by bus,or another method. The only difference is time. It may take you longer by one then by the other eventhough you are traveling the same distence.

no, it would take longer by bus then by, say, plane. by plane you can go as the crow flies. with a bus, you would have to go by road, which would take longer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You must rember that you are only allowed to ask a question in wich the answer is Yes or No.

 

Question: I am thinking of an integer 1-3 is your number higher then mine?

 

Thus if I say yes you can assume that my number is 3 if I say no my number is 1 and if I say maby the number would most likely be 2.

1) if you respond with maybe it's not a "yes or no" queston

 

2) if you could respond with maybe, you could just respond with maybe for any of our questions, and we could never hone into which number it may be

 

so, my question is...

 

Do You Feel Lucky? Well, Do Ya Punk?

Edited by Darrik

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I dont think the number question is answerable. Maybe thats the point?

 

no, it would take longer by bus then by, say, plane. by plane you can go as the crow flies. with a bus, you would have to go by road, which would take longer.

 

The distance would also be longer :(

Edited by Vex Xiang

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The distance would also be longer :(

The "distance" between any two points (say, NY to anywhere else) is the (final position)-(initial position) -- it's path independent. The *path length* may be (probably is) longer by bus (although planes get diverted off a straight path too).

 

The major time difference between bus and plane is that the plane is about 5x faster in speed. Of course, if you include the time in the airport and delays, you might as well just walk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's one for you:

 

How much wood could a Woodchuck chuck, If a Woodchuck could chuck wood?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How much wood could a Woodchuck chuck, If a Woodchuck could chuck wood?

Well, by saying IF a woodchuck could chuck wood you are saying that woodchucks don't have the ability to chuck wood, so the question of how much wood could they chuck is really a moot point. They don't have the physical frame necessary to chuck wood and if they did they wouldn't be a woodchuck.

 

But I would guess that woodchucks couldn't chuck very much wood at all since they don't have a lot of upper body strength.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's one for you:

 

How much wood could a Woodchuck chuck, If a Woodchuck could chuck wood?

8 :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's an old stupid one:

 

You have two American coins that, when added together, equal 35 cents...

this is again sadly, human logic based on the assumption that American means United states... perhaps other counties of the "Americas" have coin denominations that could fulfill this puzzle. :lol:

 

 

*other countries :( like Mexico, guatemala, canada, and anywhere else in the carribean all the way down to argentina. Natives from many of these countries consider themselves "American" because they live on the continent of North America or South America. Tourists from the USA can seem concieted to :D exclusivly call themselves americans in these places.

Edited by cdt_T'vin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In response to the integer question..

I just meld with you and ask if you remember the number...

It will be unavoidable for you to think of it.

 

then I'll know..that is.. if a vulcan would evn care in the first place. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How much wood could a Woodchuck chuck, If a Woodchuck could chuck wood?

According to Cornell University, about 315 kilograms. (Seriously) :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In response to the integer question..

I just meld with you and ask if you remember the number...

It will be unavoidable for you to think of it.

 

then I'll know..that is.. if a vulcan would evn care in the first place. :(

Except that I have high brain activity, and am trained to resist mentall probing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ok ok

 

the water level for the lake will stay the same

because the wiehg tof the anchor was already in ur boat and there fore you will not be adding any more volume to the water

Wrong!

 

When in the boat, the anchor displaces its weight. When in the water, the anchor displaces its volume. Which is greater? Why? Now what happens to the lake?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wrong!

 

When in the boat, the anchor displaces its weight. When in the water, the anchor displaces its volume. Which is greater? Why? Now what happens to the lake?

...wait... a Klingon Undertsands Logic!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wrong!

 

When in the boat, the anchor displaces its weight. When in the water, the anchor displaces its volume. Which is greater? Why? Now what happens to the lake?

yeah vex already proved me wrong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
According to Cornell University, about 315 kilograms. (Seriously) :lol:

That's very interesting!

 

Oh and I love your avatar Tach! Oh wait...... I told you that on MSN :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0