Welcome to Star Trek Simulation Forum

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
VileRomulan

How Could This Be?!

37 posts in this topic
The details of "warp" aren't really too necessary for a sim. In general, it's a relative thing. If we don't need to get somewhere too fast, Warp 5 or so. If we need to get there yesterday, Warp 9. :)

What?  You mean I didn't have to study all that subspace physics just to be a helmsman at an academy sim?  Why didn't anybody say something!?!?  :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Warp speed = cw^3

where c = speed of light and w = warp factor

 

So for example:

Warp 5 = c5^3 = c125 = 125 billion kph

Uh, I think you meant to say that Warp 5 translates to 125 times lightspeed.

 

You didn't make me CENG because of my looks, you know.

c125 *is* speed of light times 125.  I don't understand what's unclear.  c = speed of light.  c125 = c times 125.  In math formulas you don't need to use the little x to mean "times."  (In fact, you don't want to confuse it with a variable named "x").  Rather, you just put the numbers and letters next to each other - means the same thing.  c125, c x 125, c*125, all mean to multiply c by 125.  (or by five cubed, or 5^3.)

 

::thinks you had better be looking pretty amazingly good...:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Umm...

 

I'd like to confess now, that whenever I played HELM, I never payed any attention to any of this...

LOL!  And you absolutely don't have to!!  We're just being nerds.  I actually have charts that give the number of days covering various starship journeys at different warp speeds, but I only used it once out of the sheer novelty of it.  It's really... not necessary.  :D

 

And Laura... the vector navigation system *is* physics!  

 

::Dad would be so proud if he knew how I was using my college education::

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Umm...

 

I'd like to confess now, that whenever I played HELM, I never payed any attention to any of this...

LOL!  And you absolutely don't have to!!  We're just being nerds.  I actually have charts that give the number of days covering various starship journeys at different warp speeds, but I only used it once out of the sheer novelty of it.  It's really... not necessary.  :D

 

And Laura... the vector navigation system *is* physics!  

 

::Dad would be so proud if he knew how I was using my college education::

Yeah, I saw that too, it's kinda cool, like romulus to qo'nos (for some reason) would take a few days at high warp, But I still don't get how the heck that 'great curves' thing would work in space, anyways, you can get it from the brvofleet downloads section, they also have some really interesting (and accurate) stellar maps of the ST universe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But I still don't get how the heck that 'great curves' thing would work in space

It's working pretty well for 7 of 9, B'elanna, Hoshi, and T'Pol  :;):

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
c125 *is* speed of light times 125.  I don't understand what's unclear.  c = speed of light.  c125 = c times 125.  

You originally said 125 kph.  That's just barely breaking the speed limit, and not even close to escape velocity.

 

And you have seen my pic ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weellll... ::drags out the reference books:: According to various sources -- the Encyclopedia and the tech manuals (TOS and TNG) mainly -- the OLD warp scale was linear: warp 1 = speed of light [c, as in E=mc^2], warp 2= 2c, warp 6=6c, etc.  That, supposedly, explains the references to Warp 11 and 12 that crop up in TOS.  The NEW system is exponential, so warp 1=c, but warp 2 is more like c*e^2, or something.  There was a neat little graph and chart in one of said reference books, but unfortunately I'm only dragging them out in memory -- the physical copies are about 8,000 miles away.

I dont know if this is right but i thought i remember ::Man i sound like a9:: reading an article that the TOS warp scale was expontial in powers of ten ie:  warp 1= speed of light warp 2= 10 times the speed of light.  Now I dont know if this is right but it would make sence if that a ship like voyager could beat out a large ship...take Reaent (bad example take another ambasador)  by like a warp difference of .01 because once your up into the warp 9.9 area a .01 increase is like hundreds of times faster then the one before it.  (always remember im a freshman in high school)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there was no typo.

 

I think the shuttle was travelling 18 times the speed of light.

 

I think it was a secret government experiment using UFO technology found at Roswell.

 

I think the shuttle was a prototype built at Area 51.

 

I think I'm insane.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You originally said 125 kph

No, I said 125 BILLION kph ::puts finger on lower lip and looks at camera::. Good grief, Boy, READ my posts!!  ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You originally said 125 kph

No, I said 125 BILLION kph

What's the big deal? It's only 9 orders of magnitude!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmm....that reminds me of...nothing...  ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0