Welcome to Star Trek Simulation Forum

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
OdileCondacin

Council Transcript - Soltan and Selshan Technology

Mishra: How does Soltan technology work?

 

Condacin: To put things simply, Soltan responds to brainwaves. The brainwaves trigger the different "pieces" of technology to assume different forms, based on what the operator needs at the moment.

 

Mishra: And how does the operator interface with the technology?

 

Condacin: Touch. It responds best to Soltan DNA, though we had limited success activating and operating the devices ourselves. It was unpredictable what "form" of the technology -- in our case, specifically, an engineering console -- we would get. Think of it like trying to listen to a conversation on a nearby frequency to the one you're using, but not the same one, exactly -- the device would get some of what we were trying to tell us, but not all the little details.

 

Mishra: Did you test this with different races?

 

Condacin: Several. Xenexian, human, Caitian, Romulan, Nightflyer, Shadow...

 

Mishra: Did you test it with any psi-positive personnel?

 

Condacin: No. Shadow aside -- and whether or not that counts as psi-positive is for someone aside from me to answer -- we operated with non-teeps.

 

Mishra: But if if functions on brainwaves, wouldn't that be the logical step?

 

Condacin: It would be. That didn't occur to us. Under the circumstances we were also working to install the subspace drive which the devices controlled, and I suppose things were a bit more muddled than ideal laboratory conditions.

 

Mishra: Understandable.

 

Khren'nos: It ought to be our first avenue of testing, anyway.

 

Mishra: Agreed. Tell us more about the way the technology changes state.

 

Condacin: The devices go through a series of changes as it morphs. First a gel-like, viscous state, then to solid after it "remembers" the state the user desires. We counted six (correct if there's a canon number) different states in one "console"; who knows if there were more we couldn't access or even imagine well enough to retrieve.

 

Mishra: But how can it configure itself so many ways?

 

Condacin: Shape-memory. It's... "trained"... and gods if I understand it entirely... to retain several forms. The Federation's tried something along the Soltan's lines, I know, though not so extensive.

 

Mishra: And not nearly so effective.

 

Khren'nos: This change -- it's a true shape change, not merely a configuration such as we use on bridge consoles?

 

Condacin: It's a true shape change, yes. Their weapons -- hand-weaponry, that is -- work the same way. They go from a ball to a hand-encasing "glove", and then back again.

 

Khren'nos: That sounds like there's a mass change involved.

 

Condacin: The mass remains the same. Only the shape changes.

 

Khren'nos: But such a drastic alteration.... and where does the power supply go in the 'ball' mode?

 

Condacin: It's biopowered. As for where it "goes" -- as far as I can tell, it's able to shift position -- unwind and wrap with the rest of the device, if you will. It's a little difficult to dissect, if you will, because the only way to get at the thing in "glove" form is by cutting it apart while it's on a living subject.

 

Khren'nos: It can't be removed from the hand?

 

Condacin: No, and if it was able to be, it would revert to ball-form.

 

Khren'nos: And how does this weapon function?

 

Condacin: It's another mind-linked device. It uses links to the user's brainwaves, again, to control both the targeting and the power settings. These are both hard to control -- at least for me. Again, with a telepath, perhaps you'd have more success. The power settings are the more tricky of the functions, too.

 

Khren'nos: How strong is it?

 

Condacin: Very strong. I would hazard a guess, from preliminary tests, stronger than the average Fleet phaser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0