Welcome to Star Trek Simulation Forum

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Feanor

Members
  • Content count

    71
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Feanor

  1. Actually..I really would like to be an agony booth operator.
  2. BOYCOT COMCAST!
  3. hm, armada, I don't have that one :/ and I don't have the money to pick it up in the bargin bin right now (as thats where i've seen the game whenever I visit places that sell them).
  4. I've been meaning to talk to you about that (ie sponsored guilds or clubs for stsf members), look for an email from me in the next week as things settle down. Ph34r ^.^
  5. I think what Nemesis and perhaps others are really looking for Gromvik, is perhaps a report compiled by our illustrious leaders that might give us all a little insight into what is actually being done, what is being proposed, whats being worked on. All this as opposed to "we're working on it." Nobody has suggested that GM's sit around all day and plot maliciously. I am seeing a desire for a little more openness. As far as the structure of the leadership goes...well theres a reason why companies reorganize from time to time. But once again, thats a whole 'nother can of worms. Theres a simple solution to this request, make the information availiable in a format that can be readily accessed and provide it on a regular basis. Make it a type of quarterly report, all of us that sim here are investing our time in being part of STSF, a little information is not too much to ask, make it a rundown of all the currently active projects or the minutes of the GM' meetings. ::Swollows Gromviks two cents::
  6. :j Just thought I'd get a nod of approval in before the topic gets locked or dissapears.
  7. he almost signed her butt too. Chistopher Judge is a nice guy.
  8. as I noted above its more a pet peeve, a little niggling detail that sticks wrong, as far as debate goes..if I wanted to stir a debatel there are better ways to do it.but thats a debate for another time. As to weather it matters or not, well maybe it dosen't matter to you or any one else but again as in the past, I feel a sense of duty to point these inaccuracies out. Not to mention the fact that there are alot of new people here who have little or no idea the history behind SFOL ShoreLeave and the sundering of the Elves. Besides, as I understand it STSF wished to make a clean break, and it would be perfectly logical to discontinue the roll of numbers and name the gathering something completely different to establish a new tradition for this new forum.
  9. I may get squelched for this but I'd like to point out that prior to your previous meeting there was no Shoreleave West..there is a Shoreleave 26 hosted by the STAT club in baltimore. They don't call it shoreleave 26 East, and I doubt they're going to do so any time soon. So really Shoreleave West is Shoreleave West 2. Not 26, not 30...2. yeah, call me a player hater, but this little inaccuracy bugs me. If I wanted to be a real jerk I'd complain about calling it "Shoreleave" but I'm not going to do that.
  10. Well beside the fact that you're comparing what are commonly refered to as "apples" and "oranges" One being a movie series written and produced ENTIRELY by one man, the other being a series of television series created by one man, written by hired writers and contributed to and continued by other men and women. When a building is demolished, a really big one, they implode it. The implosion dosen't occur all at once, its done in sections, but you can tell from the first explosion what the effect on the building is going to be.
  11. Trek does not belong to Berman or Braga and it is NOT theirs to change on a whim.
  12. actually to some degree it did exist, it was established in Unification that the Remans were not a seperate race from the Romulans, and that Romulus and Remus are the TWIN homeworlds of the Romulan empire, as illustrated by the bird of prey clutching a green and blue globe in each talon.
  13. I rather liked the last seasons of DS9 for the exact reason you're stating. They had a consistent story line. As opposed to the TOS and TNG style which put the crew in a new situation each week and we didn't get to see the relationships between the crew evolve much. DS9 was a much more character and story driven Trek. I agree..marris does like her cookies. But enterprise does involve klingons and romulans, and thats one of the things I hate about it. It also involves ferengi and borg, yay! ^.^ Next season we get to meet the Bajorans and cardassians I'll bet. I'll probably get slaughtered for even suggesting that there is simming outside of STSF, but my own sim does ignore enterprise, it also ignores great sweeping parts of Voyager and on my plane of existance, there is no such thing as Nemesis. Just because its here dosen't mean I have to acknowledge it as part of the trek universe. Yes, bush has contradictions, I don't belive in him either.
  14. Just be happy she didn't beat you to death with it and let lifes little mysteries go on unquestioned ^_^
  15. I don't think that as fans we should support bad trek just because its trek. Hell its hardly even star trek, the only way it can be taken as a series is to assume that its a branch universe caused when the E shot down that borg sphere over earth in first contact. Every star trek series starts out with potential, TNG, DS9 (in my opinion obviously) have realized that potential...Voyager had a good solid chance at it and in some respects suceeded, but ultimately failed, Enterprise is crap, and just because its the only new stuff out there dosen't mean I'm going to happily appreciate it. Call it spoiled if you want, I don't care. I don't go out and buy crappy cookies just to have cookies either. I could happily live without a new trek series for a few years, or ten years or for the rest of my life if thats what it means to have quality someday. To be perfectly brutally honest I'd rather see a new B5 series spin off, or a series spun off of the Battlestar Galactica "miniseries" I'm ecstatic about the new season of StarGate and its spin off series StarGate Atlantis. There is GOOD sci-fi out there to watch and play with, why do we have to settle for Enterprise just because they stuck startrek in the title?
  16. I don't think data is coming back in any shape, way, manner or form.
  17. I recognize some of the names on those manticore bios ^.^ went to academy with a few, knew some afterward, played with alot of those people Alas for the good old days, I knew them well, does this mean I'm going senile Horatio?
  18. thats hard to do when theres nothing to appreciate in regard to Enterprise..or Voyager..
  19. all that means is that Viacom as a whole is doing well, that dosen't mean that Enterprise or UPN necessarily had anything to do with it.
  20. as Kosh said.."They are a dying people, we should let them pass" Who? UPN or Enterprise? "yes"
  21. Tribbles. ::shudder::
  22. Hey Fred, while I can respect your views I think you're just a little too worked up about it. I loved trekkies, it was an interesting and fun documentry, I hope I see myself in Trekkies 2 :j I think it shows a bunch of people who aren't afraid to wander around on a daily basis being different, they enjoy what they're doing, they're not hurting anyone, they take the title of trek geek and wear it like a badge of honor. As for galaxy quest..I think it was a great movie, but not a tribute. ^.^
  23. I like accounting class :( ^_^
  24. I left my accounting class early to see the entire first day of the marathon.
  25. I'll agree that Ezri was cute, like little sister cute, but not desireable cute.