Welcome to Star Trek Simulation Forum

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Marris Krax

Members
  • Content count

    150
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Marris Krax


  1. Mayhap it is just a similar phrase that exists on Vulcan? ^.^ As we discussed in my lit class recently, there is such a thing as reading too much into things :P

     

    Besides, Doyle was into free love, I think, definitely not Vulcan-like. Him or Wells. Or both. It's been a while since I did reports on those gentlemen.

     

    Edit: Ahh, wait, I recall now. Wells was the free-love nut who married his cousin. Doyle believed in fairies and ghosts. Either way, not Vulcan-like at all ^.^


  2. I don't pretend to be an expert on this, but I believe that it's just a bot that scans the text for key words, then adds some advertising to it. I don't think human eyes ever see it, and I don't think the bot keeps records on what it scans. And if you're really paranoid, well then the message is still on their severs regardless so if a hacker or someone with similar skills was interested they could look it up anyway ^.^


  3. Domestic Box Office Numbers for 2004 (As of July 26):

    1) Shrek 2: $430,317,578

    3) Spider-man 2: $332,378,153

    4) Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban: $242,349,326

     

    Worldwide Box Office Numbers for 2004 (As of July 28) in the Millions:

    1) Shrek 2: $774.2

    2) Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban: $701.3

    4) Spider-man 2: $597.4

    This has always bothered me slightly....

     

    We judge a movie's sucess and popularity based on how much money it makes. Shrek 2 has broken the record held by Nemo which was held by I-Don't-Know. Only problem I see with this is that ticket prices and inflation constantly make those numbers rise regardless of how many people are actually watching it. I don't suppose there are any sites out there that compare the popularity of movies based on the number of tickets sold, 'cause that would be a little more...umm...accurate assessment of the popularity of a film, I think ^.^

     

    And please, no comments about the movie industry being a business and because of that they use profits for an assessment of worth for movies, because I am both aware of that fact and am choosing as a movie-watcher to ignore it, because I care about how many butts are in those seats.


  4. ::thwaps the fish with a fish::

     

    Anything as far as income goes helps. And McDonald's employs mostly high school and college kids. I don't think a college kid working for McDonald's is doing so for fun, but to help offset education costs.

     

    ::gives the fish the fish, because she thwapped him with it and that's gotta hurt and he likes fish::


  5. Unless I am very much mistaken, I believe that the movie titles are *all* supposed to be bad and/or cheesy. The Star Wars series is an homage of sorts to the Saturday matinee, B-movie-type, rot-yer-brains serials and whatnot. Lucas wanted to tap into that weird, nostalgic vibe thing. So when they come up with a bad name for one of their movies, it is done so *on purpose* and therefore makes the title fitting :P

     

    Least that's my logic.